Vanilla List Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 17:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <000e01bfb79c$c4e22780$9d05d2cc@san.rr.com> from "Daniel Damouth" at May 06, 2000 01:50:53 PM

"Daniel Damouth" <ddamout1@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
> One thing I've notices is that compilers don't always use the same
> representation for booleans.

All the code is in C, hence no booleans.

-Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: James Cameron <quozl@us.netrek.org>

References:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: "Daniel Damouth" <ddamout1@san.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Next by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread