On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:41:29AM -0500, Mike Miller wrote:
> > 4) Shall we vote by replying to the list with a msg header that indicates the
> > vote clearly, or via some other method?
>
> Maybe, but a different system would be better. I'll look into that.
> Maybe someone else has a scheme for doing this.
Please look back in the archives for the last vote we took. Just have
a form e-mail with the options, and have everybody interested fill in
their choice and send it to the list. Then, everybody can count the
votes with a few greps and sorts.
Sorting through last e-mails on the topic, I found these options:
[ ] No change (Twin Cities Linux User Group) -> TCLUG
[ ] Twin Cities GNU/Linux User Group -> TCLUG
[ ] Twin Cities GNU/Linux User Group -> TCGLUG
Are there any other options that we should consider?
Cheers,
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20081008/511e855d/attachment.pgp