Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 16:58:57 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971125232350.14693I-100000@alive.znep.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971125092839.20105F-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 11:31 PM 11/25/97 -0700, Marc Slemko wrote:
<snip>
>
>No CPU use that I am aware of, because that would probably reveal just
>how horrid some things are.  Submit it as a feature request as many people
>have been doing for years; don't worry, they aren't ignored you just never
>hear back on them and nothing requested in such a manner is every
>implemented.

There are over 100 new features/enhancements listed in the 6.0b1 release
notes.
The vast majority of these came through that process.

CPU usage is not one of them. Sorry.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>

Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread