Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) Re: tik.m40 working at all?
>Does *anyone* have a Max working reliably with tik.m40 ? I scanned
>the archives of this list and cannot find any mention of success.
I hereby pronounce success, at least to the degree to be expected from an
extremely complex piece of equipment such as a Max.
>We have a Max4048 that spontaneously and randomly reboots, sometimes with:
>
> FATAL ERROR: Index: 1 Load: tik.m40 Revision: 5.0Ap36
> Date: 12/17/1997. Time: 19:54:12
> Location: b017e5f4 b01804d0 b0180000 b007ab88 b007ac9c b004eb58
>
>(different "Location" each time). Usually, though, it shows a 'normal'
>Index: 100 after its self-induced reboot. Everything _appears_
>to be working fine prior to the reboot -- ISDN calls succeed, K56
>calls succeed, OSPF works. Then suddenly, poof.
>
>Has anyone had reasonable uptime when using this machine with ISDN
>and K56 calls? I'll gladly back down to an older release (currently
>running 5.0Ap36) if that'll help.
Up: 16:04:26:01
I've run tik.m40 with OSPF for months with ever-increasing stability (for
the most part). We're now at 5.0Ap36 and things have been pretty good. Not
perfect, but not fatal errors whatsoever.
I attribute this to the following:
Ascend is working bugs out, especially with OSPF, continuously.
I run a 4000 with only a single PRI and a single K65-12 card.
I religiously fclear, fsave, nvr after each new software load or if I start
having weirdness.
Peter Lalor
Infoasis
plalor@infoasis.com
http://www.infoasis.com/
415-459-7991 x102
415-459-7992 fax
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>