(ASCEND) Re: AO/DI (WAS: NFAS?)

To: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>
Subject: (ASCEND) Re: AO/DI (WAS: NFAS?)
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 11:41:12 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com, jhoward@lyceum.com
In-Reply-To: <v03130303b0c065cb4ecb@[206.40.74.10]>
References: <199712190645.WAA09695@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:02 AM 12/19/97 -0800, Peter Lalor wrote:
>>From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
>>The end user sends X.25 over his BRI D channel, the switch sends it out an
>>X.25 interface. It *may* go through an X.75 connection within the carrier
>>network or to another network. Then it goes in an X.25 link to the Max.
>>That link could be over any interface. It would likely be over T1/E1 or the
>>V.35 interface.
>
>So, will we be dedicating whole circuits to AO/DI, or T1 or PRI channels?

That's up to you and how much X.25 bandwidth you need.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Re: AO/DI (WAS: NFAS?)

From: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) K56 and X2
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: AO/DI (WAS: NFAS?)
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: AO/DI (WAS: NFAS?)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread