Re: (ASCEND) K56 and X2

["Will Pierce" <willp@dreamscape.com>]

That's bogus. 100%.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Huish <Paul.Huish@onyx.net>
To: ascend-users@bungi.com <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Date: Friday, December 19, 1997 6:54 AM
Subject: (ASCEND) K56 and X2


There was a short article in the computer press here in the UK that said
that the Rockwell K56 consortium had agreed with 3-COM (Owners of USR/X2)
that the common standard should be X2. This will reduce the delay agreeing
an international standard.

Does anyone know anything more about it?
Are Rockwell keeping it quiet as they don't want to admit to dropping K56
in favour of X2??

After loads of patch releases we finally seem to have a version of k56 that
sort of works.
Now we will have to go through more patch releases getting X2 to work on
the MAX.

Is X2 better than K56 ?  From what I had read I thought they performed
about the same.

Paul


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul.Huish@Onyx.net                                   http://www.onyx.net/
ONYX Internet Ltd, Zetland Buildings,Exchange Sq, Middlesbrough,UK,TS1 1DE
+44 (0)1642 216 200,  +44 (0)1642 216 201 Fax,  +44 (0)1642 216 237 Direct
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap38 for the MAX products
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75<-->75 and NAT.
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) K56 and X2
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Ascend 4048 probe to dialups
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread