Re: (ASCEND) 127.0.0.[2-xxx]

To: Michiel Boland <boland@diva.nl>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 127.0.0.[2-xxx]
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 14:48:59 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971228223838.22929A-100000@duivendaal.diva.nl>
References: <3.0.5.32.19971228102340.008938d0@darla>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:41 PM 12/28/97 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Dec 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:
>
>>      The reject (rj0) interface is always up. 
>> 
>>      The reject address is 127.0.0.2. Packets routed to this interface are
>> sent back to the source address with an ICMP "host unreachable" message.
>
>When I ping the address 255.255.255.255 (from a cisco
>for instance), my max (5.0Ap5) responds with source address
>127.0.0.2. Surely this is a bug?

Our support team just confirmed this behavior in the 5.0p branch. But it
works properly in the 6.0 branch. The Max reports back with it's physical
interface.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 127.0.0.[2-xxx]

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) 127.0.0.[2-xxx]

From: Michiel Boland <boland@diva.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Status of a TR?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Status of a TR?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 127.0.0.[2-xxx]
Next by thread: (ASCEND) MRTG and max4000
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread