Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) MAX-->CISCO ISDN connexion
On Tue, 13 May 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:
> See the FAQ item #6a for some hints on this, and if it is still unclear
> then let us know.
mmm... what #6a stands for ??? :)
>
> >And the other probs, is if I set Eithet in the encaps option (instead of
> >PAP or CHAP), some of our ISDN customers can't log in anymore.....
>
> Probably the infamous CHAP/RADIUS/UNIX conflict....?
>
Uhhh... haven't heard about this.... yet
> >Tought
> >Either meant PAP, CHAP or None ..... am I wrong ?
>
> No, either means PAP or CHAP. It will cause the MAX to suggest CHAP first
> (most secure), and if rejected by the remote side, will offer PAP. If that
> is also rejected, it will clear the call.
Doesn't seem to work well uh !
Cheers
|David Ramahefason, rama@easynet.fr,systems@easynet.fr|
|Administrateur Systeme/Reseau, Easynet France SA |
|Think different Think BSD http://www.FreeBSD.org |
|Wrap around probs with Python http://www.python.org |
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or <ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>
Follow-Ups:
References: