Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) numbered interfaces
On Tue, Oct 14, 1997 at 03:59:08PM +0200, Michiel Boland wrote:
> has anyone ever successfully set up a Pipeline-Max connection
> using numbered interfaces? Any magic that needs to be performed?
Not Max-Pipeline (I wouldn't know any good reason why to use a
transit network when the equipment can do point-to-point properly),
but Max-Cisco (the guy on the other end insisted on a transit net,
I know that Ciscos can do "unnumbered"). But with current firmwares
it is rather trivial:
LAN Adrs: Exactly what it states. The Address and Netmask of the
Ethernet Interface of the remote router. Used to auto-
matically plug a route here (as always).
IF Adrs: The local transit net interface IP and Mask
WAN Alias: The remote transit net interface IP
Works as expected, Ascend finally got it (until late 4.6C when these
options appeared supporting transfer nets was possible but hairy).
Example:
LAN Adrs: 194.99.77.5/25
IF Adrs: 192.168.13.1/30
WAN Alias: 192.168.13.2
Uses 192.168.13.0/30 as a transit net, .1 is local, .2 is remote, and
plugs a route to 194.99.77.0/25 via 192.168.13.2.
--
Kanther-Line: PGP SSH IDEA MD5 GOST RIPE-MD160 3DES RSA FEAL32 RC4
+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
| o | \\\- Brain Inside -/// | o |
| o | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | o |
| o | Andre' Beck (ABPSoft) beck@ibh-dd.de XLink PoP Dresden | o |
+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: