Re: (ASCEND) NFAS

To: Joe Shaw <jshaw@evillive.insync.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) NFAS
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 18:00:16 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Oct 1997 14:30:30 EDT." <Pine.LNX.3.96.971017142544.13324A-100000@evillive.insync.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> Has anyone gotten NFAS to reliably work with the Ascend Max 4000?  I'm
> running 5.0Ap16 (p24 and p27 have too many problems answering the calls),
> tbi.m40.  NFAS works, and I've provisioned the lines according to what the
> Telco (Time Warner) here requires, but the PRI go up and down too much.
> I've tested the cables and everything else I can think of.  We're getting
> layer 3 Q.931 errors (this is reported to me from the Time Warner switch
> guy), and I'm wondering if there is a problem in the Ascend Implementation
> of NFAS or if it's a telco problem.  Normally this would warrant a call
> to the Ascend tech support desk, but I don't think I have the time to wait
> for them to get back to me.

What id the switch type.

We are using NFAS on a dozen T1's (not all in the same group of course!)
and have been for a long time and through many different versions of
the software.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) NFAS

From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@evillive.insync.net>

References:

(ASCEND) NFAS

From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@evillive.insync.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) NFAS
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Don't look so hot...
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) NFAS
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NFAS
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread