Re: (ASCEND) NFAS

[Alex P <alex@stomp.gomax.com>]

I've found that whatever problem you may have is _ALWAYS_ on the telco
end.  Ascends implementation is fine.  I use it all over the country with
different telco's.  Sometimes things go fine, sometimes it takes an hour
or two of debugging with the telco to get things running, but once you get
things up the first time, things generally go fine.  

Alex P

On Fri, 17 Oct 1997, Joe Shaw wrote:

> 
> Has anyone gotten NFAS to reliably work with the Ascend Max 4000?  I'm
> running 5.0Ap16 (p24 and p27 have too many problems answering the calls),
> tbi.m40.  NFAS works, and I've provisioned the lines according to what the
> Telco (Time Warner) here requires, but the PRI go up and down too much.
> I've tested the cables and everything else I can think of.  We're getting
> layer 3 Q.931 errors (this is reported to me from the Time Warner switch
> guy), and I'm wondering if there is a problem in the Ascend Implementation
> of NFAS or if it's a telco problem.  Normally this would warrant a call
> to the Ascend tech support desk, but I don't think I have the time to wait
> for them to get back to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
> NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
>  
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) NFAS
• From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@evillive.insync.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Uh-Oh ..... ;)
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) Pipe75 and Java Pipeline Monitor
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NFAS
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) NFAS
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread