Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) IP Pool leak in a Max2000 (5.0A)





 MAX's in the past have had the IP pool leakage problem
for as long as I can remember, It show's it's ugly head
every now and then, I never ran 5.0A so but with my experience
with the Max's I'd have to say your best bet is to go ahead
and upgrade. The show pools will show you right away
if you have fixed the problem.

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet


On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Alex Simpson wrote:

> Will upgrading to 5.0Ap27 fix this IP pool leak problem.
> 
> We have a Max2000 (5.0A) with an IP pool of 20 addresses.  This Max has been
> running for several months with no problems.
> 
> However just recently users have begun receiving the error "Could not
> establish a compatible set of protocols" from Win95.  When the user
> specifies their own IP address, they can connect just fine, but the Max will
> not assign one to them until it is reset.
> 
> I believe I have tracked the culprit to the IP pool.  It is currently set
> for 20 addresses, which is more than enough, considering that I only have 1
> PRI into the box and only 1 DM-12, and never really use more than about 4
> ports at one time..So anyway, I have noticed now that even when I don't have
> anyone dialed in I have addresses out of the pool in use.  For example, I
> currently have only two (2) users dialed in, a SHOW POOLS command reports
> 
> ascend% show pools
> Pool#                Base            Count      InUse
>    1             xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx     20         11
>  Number of remaining allocated addresses:    0
> ascend% show modems
> slot:item    modem    status
>    2:1         1      idle
>    2:2         2      idle
>    2:3         3      idle
>    2:4         4      idle
>    2:5         5      idle
>    2:6         6      idle
>    2:7         7      online
>    2:8         8      idle
>    2:9         9      online
>    2:10        10      idle
>    2:11        11      idle
>    2:12        12      idle
> ascend%
> 
> 
> This says I have 11 addresses in use out of my pool of 20, by Noon tomorrow
> I will have 20 in use, and the Max will stop assigning addresses and I will
> have to reset it.  Also what does the # of remaining allocated addresses:  0
> mean...?????
> 
> I think this thread has been discussed before but I can't find it, sorry.
> 
> I am considering upgrading to 5.0Ap27 if that will fix this problem....???
> 
> Your feedback and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________
> 
> Alex Simpson
> Director of Technical Services
> NetSolutions Corp
> 
> alex@nscorp.net
> http://www.nscorp.net
> http://www.connect-ed.net
> 
> 615.367.4404  x101
> 615.367.3887  fax
> 615.303.7411  pager
> 
> Airport Executive Plaza
> 1321 Murfreesboro Rd
> Suite 721
> Nashville, TN  37217
> __________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


References: