>> I wonder if the ITU-T spec will require the V.8bis tone...... ;) > > Agreed, that would be interesting, As many of you know X2 has >not V.8BIS tone (aka Burp Tone). I'd like to see it without that >stupid little tone, Then hopefully people would be able to avoid >the large scale problems that I have seen with older V.34 modems. Since the justification for having the V.8bis tone there in the first place was to allow the server/client ends to identify themselves, I wonder if the same justification will be used in the ITU spec. Kevin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10284.html">Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com></LI> </UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10309.html">Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10319.html">Re: (ASCEND) Ap33 Warnings</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10318.html">(ASCEND) Q: P75 and MS Exchange Server (via NAT)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10309.html">Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09955.html">(ASCEND) Pipe 75, Fails to establish second 'B' Channel, MPP</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#10320"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd214.html#10320"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>