Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13

To: Ascend User-Group <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 11:08:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971031101032.3721C-100000@babylon.erols.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.19971030174433.00f4dfb8@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:12 AM 10/31/97 -0500, Jason Nealis wrote:
>

>> I wonder if the ITU-T spec will require the V.8bis tone...... ;)
>
> Agreed, that would be interesting, As many of you know X2 has
>not V.8BIS tone (aka Burp Tone). I'd like to see it without that
>stupid little tone, Then hopefully people would be able to avoid
>the large scale problems that I have seen with older V.34 modems.

Since the justification for having the V.8bis tone there in the 
first place was to allow the server/client ends to identify themselves,
I wonder if the same justification will be used in the ITU spec.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ap33 Warnings
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Q: P75 and MS Exchange Server (via NAT)
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 1.3Ap13
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Pipe 75, Fails to establish second 'B' Channel, MPP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread