Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....
Jim; why do you believe that the Max should allways repond with the IP
assigned to the _last_ dialup user instead of the IP of the max, even
when traceroutes are run to someone elses network ? Also, were do you
get the idea that I want unnumberred interfaces ?
-|-----Original Message-----
-|From: Jim Howard [mailto:jhoward@lyceum.com]
-|Sent: Saturday, August 22, 1998 2:38 PM
-|To: Raul Zighelboim
-|Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
-|Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....
-|
-|
-|At 23:11 1998/08/21 -0500, Raul Zighelboim wrote:
-|>I assigned numberred point to point links to isdn dialup; 1
-|/30 ip on my
-|>end, and another /30 ip in the customer end.
-|
-|>With the last release of Ascend, the Max IP Address (used to
-|always be
-|>the ip assigned to the Ethernet port) follows the WAN ip of the last
-|>incoming call.
-|>
-|>So, A traceroute would show : Ethernet -> WAN13-local_ip ->
-|> WAN27-remote_ip when it used to be :
-|> Ethernet -> MAX-Ethernet_ip ->
-|WAN27-remote_ip...
-|
-|This sounds to me like the way a numbered link is supposed to work,
-|and it was probably just broken before...
-|
-|If you want the WAN interface to respond with the same IP
-|as the ethernet, you really want "unnumbered".
-|
-|-Jim H
-|----
-|Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
-|jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
-|
-|My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
-|Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
-|
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>