Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

To: Andre Beck <beck@ibh.de>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:10:50 -0700
Cc: Ascend Users <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980714165232.03112@ibh-dd.de>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980710155211.00941960@spanky.ascend.com><35A67BC7.A9CD4BD7@uss.net><06df01bdac43$db459a40$96449ecf@lerdesk.cyberramp.net><3.0.5.32.19980710155211.00941960@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 04:52 PM 7/14/98 +0200, Andre Beck wrote:
>AFAIK redoing LCP after Auth (aka after LCP was already up) is a RFC
>violation anyway, isn't it ?

Not doing LCP after auth would be an RFC violation. You must always accept
LCP. You can nak or reject any LCP, but you should at least respond. 

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

(ASCEND) Call-logging?

From: "G. Saraber" <gsaraber@nwonline.net>

Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

From: "David S. Langlands" <dsl@uss.net>

RE: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

From: "Larry Rosenman-CyberRamp System Administration" <ler@cyberramp.net>

Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work

From: Andre Beck <beck@ibh.de>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) DHCP and WinNT 4.0 Workstation
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max4004 question
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Making Shotgun work
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread