Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Stable Code Issues - <rant>
Paul Rolland wrote:
>
> Hello Christophe and the list...
>
> At 4:56 15/07/98, Christopher Beaumont wrote:
> >4:00am Pacific Time
> >
>
> >Well, I've taken a look at the beta, but somehow I don't feel to confident
> >with a beta when the regular code is starting to loose customers and
> >effect the reputation of my company. The current link from the web site
> >for the "Max Family" contains 6.1.0 of code, not 6.1.2, with no notes to
> >explain why. Through 8 versions of 6xx code there should be at least one
> >that could be considered stable, the new features don't necessarily mean
> >much to our existing customers who are dependant on old features.
>
> Well, I must say that I do agree with you... And now is coming 7.0b0 out...
> What we are looking for is a <STABLE> release of code, not an always
> growing release number with an increasing number of features that some
> of us don't ask for, and an ever increasing number of TRs opened but not
> so often closed...
>
<snip>
All in favor say "YAY". WOW! Was that the "shout that was
heard across the world"? Just kidding... I agree too.
The question is, who do we tell? I was under the impression
(due to past discussions) that Kevin and Matt are doing
this "out of the goodness in their hearts", and that
Ascend does not pay much credence to this list, as we are
but a few of the masses... We do not represent the majority
opinion.
Whether or not that is true, I would like to voice my opinion
to Ascend. So, again, who do we tell?
thanks,
Robert
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: