Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 7.2.3 for the Max
Andy,
Do you know what kind of switch is used to serve you the CT1's?
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Walden <andy@mtco.com>
To: Jason Nealis <nealis@rcn.com>
Cc: <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 7.2.3 for the Max
>
>3 and 4 CT1's per box actually. This particular one has 3 switched CT1's
>and one nailed T1 for connectivity.
>
>andy
>
>On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
>>
>> 2 PRI's per box?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 08:11:13PM -0500, Andy Walden stated
>> >
>> > Like I said, no obvious complaints. Sure we have issues with modems
>> > occasionally, but its usually worked out with a flash upgrade or the
like.
>> > Currently here are a list of the speeds connected now, sorted by speed.
>> > Majority of connections are decent as far as I'm concerned. I do only
run
>> > analog on my 4xxx's and no stacking or anything else weird.
>> >
>> > 14400 14400 PPP
>> > 14400 14400 PPP
>> > 21600 16800 PPP
>> > 26400 24000 PPP
>> > 26400 24000 PPP
>> > 26400 26400 PPP
>> > 26400 26400 PPP
>> > 26400 26400 PPP
>> > 26400 26400 PPP
>> > 26400 28800 PPP
>> > 26400 28800 PPP
>> > 28800 24000 PPP
>> > 28800 26400 PPP
>> > 28800 28800 PPP
>> > 28800 28800 PPP
>> > 36000 28800 PPP
>> > 36000 33600 PPP
>> > 36000 28800 PPP
>> > 36000 28800 PPP
>> > 36000 26400 PPP
>> > 40000 26400 PPP
>> > 40000 26400 PPP
>> > 40000 28800 PPP
>> > 40000 26400 PPP
>> > 40000 26400 PPP
>> > 42000 26400 PPP
>> > 42000 26400 PPP
>> > 42000 26400 PPP
>> > 42000 28800 PPP
>> > 42667 26400 PPP
>> > 44000 26400 PPP
>> > 45333 24000 PPP
>> > 46000 24000 PPP
>> > 46000 28800 PPP
>> > 46000 28800 PPP
>> > 46667 26400 PPP
>> > 48000 24000 PPP
>> > 48000 24000 PPP
>> > 48000 26400 PPP
>> > 48000 26400 PPP
>> > 49333 24000 PPP
>> > 49333 26400 PPP
>> > 49333 26400 PPP
>> > 49333 28800 PPP
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Jason Nealis wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Well, I have to ask, there has been a number of modem enhancements
since that code that
>> > > stabilizes out V.90 and addresses some X2 compatibility issues in
regards to working with V.90? So
>> > > why not upgrade?
>> > >
>> > > Unless your only running V.34?
>> > >
>> > > Jason Nealis
>> > > RCN
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 03:56:34PM -0500, Andy Walden stated
>> > > >
>> > > > My $.02 :)
>> > > >
>> > > > ts-4% sh uptime
>> > > > system uptime: up 485 days, 4 hours, 8 minutes, 8 seconds
>> > > >
>> > > > Software +6.1.0+
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > Andy Walden Work Email: andy@mtco.com.
>> > > > Network Administrator, Pers Email: andy@netimagination.com.
>> > > > MTCO Communications Phone: (800) 859-6826
>> > > > "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men."
>> > > > -Willi Wonka
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Oliver J Albrecht wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In article <70955c70e713@news.allcon.net> you wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >Interesting, thought 7.0.x was the last release for the 40xx
series... How
>> > > > > >about a 6.1.xx update that includes the updated modem code? Our
WinModem
>> > > > > >users are non-too-happy with Ascend since that is the only
person we can
>> > > > > >blame for the lack of updates in this branch. Now, if 7.2.x
will run on the
>> > > > > >40xx, that may be an option, but I suggest everyone wait 6-8
months for the
>> > > > > >bugs to be ironed out, it tends to take that long.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Why not use 7.0.X on the 4000? Depending on you configuration,
7.0.4
>> > > > > will probably be just fine. It ran without problems for over 4
months
>> > > > > on all our Maxen (2000 through 6000), until we updated them today
to
>> > > > > run 7.0.22 (the 4000's) and 7.2.3 (the rest). YMMV...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > FWIW, if I remember right, 6.1.X included the infamous HDLC
zombie bug
>> > > > > up to around 6.1.7. Was that ever fixed in that branch? I
remember we
>> > > > > went right to the 7.0 betas due to this one. 7.0.4 was definitely
the
>> > > > > most stable release we ever ran on an Ascend box so far.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Oliver J. Albrecht AllCon GmbH http://www.allcon.net/
>> > > > > Network Administration Westerallee 139 Tel: +49 461 90393-0
>> > > > > olli@spike.allcon.net D-24941 Flensburg Fax: +49 461 90393-33
>> > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>> > > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to
ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>> > > > > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>> > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>> > > > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jason Nealis
>> > > Director of Internet Operations
>> > > RCN
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jason Nealis
>> Director of Internet Operations
>> RCN
>>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>