Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) RE: ascend-users-digest V96 #1970
I'm Henry Goes not Harry Goes. resend msg to right person.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com
[mailto:owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com]
Sent: Saturday, 20 May, 2000 7:45 AM
To: ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com
Subject: ascend-users-digest V96 #1970
ascend-users-digest Friday, 19 May 19100 Volume 96 : Number
1970
In this issue:
Re: (ASCEND) Re: FTP - restricting clients' access to other directories on
FTP
server
(ASCEND) Static Routes via Radius
Re: (ASCEND) FAQ
(ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
(ASCEND) Up to date TNT manuals needed!
Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline power supplies
Re: (ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
(ASCEND) Lucent 'support' in a tailspin
Re: (ASCEND) Lucent 'support' in a tailspin
Re: (ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Peter Copeland" <Tharen@i-t-c.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 01:19:33 -0500
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: FTP - restricting clients' access to other
directories on FTP server
Indeed - I had just installed SERV-U FTP from deerfield.com a couple of
days ago.
That program is "Vastly" superior to IIS 4 FTP.
It took me 10 minutes to do set all the restrictions I wanted.
At 07:05 AM 5/17/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Use a different FTP Server program.
>We had the same dilema. They can see all the other user subs and can
change
>to them, but just can't write.
>I didn't like that.
>
>Try using Serv-U FTP by Cat-Soft. I think www.cat-soft.com.
>
>When a user logs in it pops them into their own dir and they can't go
>anyplace else.
>
>John
>
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 5/17/2000 at 12:34 AM Peter Copeland wrote:
>
>>I haven't tried it with IIS 5. I would think this feature would be
>available in
>>IIS4. Still no luck, though.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Peter
>>
>>At 12:55 PM 5/14/2000 +0000, you wrote:
>>>Were you able to redirect iis5 ftp from ftproot to wwwroot?
>>>If so, how?
>>>Thanks,
>>>Gert Jensen
>>>Danica Computing
>>>Ithaca, NY
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3 May 2000 06:58:43 GMT, in microsoft.public.inetserver.iis you
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>I've set up IIS 4.0 on NT4 server and am running an FTP server.
>>>>Clients need R/W permissions for their own directories.
>>>>I want them to only see their own directories. I don't even want them
>>>>to be able to get to the root of the "FTPROOT" directory.
>>>>I have alias directories matching their login names,
>>>>so once they login, the FTP clients are each dropped into their
>>>>respective directories automatically.
>>>>I know that NTFS and IIS permissions work together here and, if there is
>>>>a discrepancy, the most restrictive permissions set will
>>>>apply. However, even though I have the FTP clients as
>>>>"USER" level only and have no "USER" permissions for
>>>>the "FTPROOT" directory, the clients can still access all
>>>>other clients' directories within "FTPROOT" whether it's their
>>>>own directory not.
>>>>
>>>>How do I accomplish this restriction?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>
>>
>>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Oliver Stettner <os@landshut.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:30:14 +0200
Subject: (ASCEND) Static Routes via Radius
Hello everybody,
for dialout connections to users we have static routes in our RADIUS
users file:
route-tnt-1 ...
Whe I change the RADIUS file (to add new routes or delete old ones) I
have to do a "refresh -r" on the TNT to refresh the routing table.
Is there a possibility to do that once a day automatically? As I can see
from the RADIUS logfiles the TNT does refresh the routes periodically
(every 2 Weeks or so), but I want that to happen more often.
Oliver.
- --
Oliver Stettner | mailto:os@landshut.org
Laendgasse 120 | http://www.landshut.org/members/os/
D-84028 Landshut |
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Matthew Smith <m@mmsnet.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:19:19 +0100
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) FAQ
Has been lost some time ago.
I am building a reference document to replace it - a combination
of FAQ and where to go for information. If you have any info,
e-mail me at m@uk.com with it.
- -M
At 11:25 AM 5/19/00 +1000, Craig wrote:
>Anyone know where the FAQ has gone to? It is not at the address listed?
>
><http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq
>
>Cheers
>Craig
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Ray Davis <ray@carpe.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:44:03 +0200
Subject: (ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
I'm getting nowhere with support@ascend.com anymore, so maybe someone
on the list can help...
We have a Max 2000 (S/N: 7171098) which has been running fine for
a couple years under 5.0Ap36. No analog modems - just ISDN. Via
radius it was configured to authenticate users via call-id or via
pap/chap. i.e. If the call came in with an isdn call-id and there
was a corresponding entry in the radius users file then the call
was authenticated. If the isdn call-id was unknown or if there
was no call-id then pap/chap was accepted. Perfect!
Then we installed a couple of 8 modem cards (MX-SL-8MOD-S56) and,
of course, had to finally upgrade the software. We upgraded to
7.0.4 (using reik.m20 and feik.m20). Now call-id is being handled
differently and we haven't been able to figure out how to fix it.
Now if a call comes in with a call-id and the radius users file
knows this call-id, the call is authenticated as expected. But if
a call comes in with an unknown call-id, the call is immediately
rejected (call refused) and the caller is not given the
opportunity to authenticate with pap/chap. Only if the call has
no call-id is pap/chap allowed.
Under Ethernet/Answer these are set:
Use Answer as Default=Yes
Profile Reqd=Yes
Id Auth=Prefer
Thanks,
Ray
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: "Jyrki Kainulainen" <jyrki.kainulainen@datatie.fi>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:42:04 +0300
Subject: (ASCEND) Up to date TNT manuals needed!
Hello.
I have manuals for TNT soft 7.0.0 (html) and release notes for 8.0.1.
Is there any more up to date manuals available? I.e reference giude for new
commands and all those "curious" Radius attributes.
?? end of message ??????????????????????????????
Jyrki Kainulainen Tel: +358 10 2638 349
Product Development Assistant Fax: +358 10 2638 399
jyrki.kainulainen@datatie.fi
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Oy Datatie Ab Tel: +358 10 26 002
Malmin kauppatie 8 A www.datatie.fi
FIN-00700 Helsinki
Finland
??????????????????????????????????????????????
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: "Bob Dozier" <rwdozier@apex2000.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:52:09 -0500
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline power supplies
You can order the power supply by calling 1-800-621-9578, option 4.
Select presales to confirm the correct model for our unit. There
was a model change for some of the P50, P75, P85 or P130s.
_____________________________________________________________________
Bob Dozier rwdozier@apex2000.net
Apex 2000 Internet Services Corporation Phone: (915) 570-1676
From: Ken FitzGerald-Smith <kfs@foreshadowlogic.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 21:51:37 +0100
Subject: (ASCEND) Pipeline power supplies
>From: Dennis Reiter <denny@reiters.org>
>Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 08:42:40 -0500
>
>Anybody ever found a supplier for the power supplies for Pipeline
>boxes? My Lucent supplier tells me they don't sell them separately,
>and I haven't found anybody yet that has a match, either.
>
>TIA,
>
>Denny Reiter
18V 750mA DC (+ve tip) is all that is required! The problem is primarily
finding an 18V supply and secondly finding one that delivers 750mA
continuous. Most top out at 12V.
I ended up using a variable psu until I received the official psu from
Ascend (for which they charged lots) - my original was 110V and I needed
220V.
I do recall that 15V 1A psu's were perfectly adequate and you will find
15V 1A power supplies are used lots for powering so called amplified
Loudspeakers, you know those multimedia speakers that PC owners buy --
yeah the ones that deliver 820 Watts PMPO or 5 Watts RMS. Now for fun
someone explain to me how using any math, you can get 500 Watts plus
peak-music-power from 5 Watts RMS and moreover who believes this crap.
Anyway back to the subject at hand, I have a labtec psu that fulfills the
bill except that you would have to change the wiring of the plug because
they use -ve tip!
Ken FitzGerald-Smith
Foreshadow Logic Limited
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Jake Messinger <jake@portmasters.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:07:55 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Ray Davis wrote:
> Now if a call comes in with a call-id and the radius users file
> knows this call-id, the call is authenticated as expected. But if
> a call comes in with an unknown call-id, the call is immediately
> rejected (call refused) and the caller is not given the
> opportunity to authenticate with pap/chap. Only if the call has
> no call-id is pap/chap allowed.
> Under Ethernet/Answer these are set:
> Use Answer as Default=Yes
> Profile Reqd=Yes
> Id Auth=Prefer
Are you using radius? You may need to set up another radius profile.
- --
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advamed.com
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@advamed.com,ICQ# 4403734 disc.cba.uh.edu
Houston, Texas 77074 www.advamed.com/~jake jakes.org
Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~' '~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:45:16 -0700
Subject: (ASCEND) Lucent 'support' in a tailspin
On the off chance anyone who cares at Lucent reads this, Support is
reaching all-time lows lately. Every ticket I've opened in the last
few months generates occasional "Sorry for the delay in responding"
messages and eventually (as in two months later) a too-brief
pseudo-response that either suggests I upgrade my firmware, downgrade
my firmware or in some other way ducks the question. It appears that
the support staff is so overwhelmed that they try to dispose of old
tickets in the most expedient way possible, by quickly writing
anything and hoping the customer just drops the issue.
Does this sound familiar to anyone else on this list?
Of the four or five tickets I've opened in the last few months, only
one received an immediate, lucid response stating that the problem
was a firmware bug and was fixed in TAOS 8.0.3. Unfortunately, TAOS
8.0.3 hasn't been released, but that's another story. The remaining
tickets are being given the runaround and the support provided has
been effectively nil.
I've used Ascend gear for years. Does this make me consider my options? Yes.
- --
Peter Lalor Infoasis
plalor@infoasis.com The San Francisco Bay Area's Macintosh
415-459-7991 Consultant and Internet Service Provider
415-459-7992 fax http://www.infoasis.com/
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Brad <brad@americanisp.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:27:16 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Lucent 'support' in a tailspin
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Peter Lalor wrote:
> On the off chance anyone who cares at Lucent reads this, Support is
> reaching all-time lows lately. Every ticket I've opened in the last
> few months generates occasional "Sorry for the delay in responding"
> messages and eventually (as in two months later) a too-brief
> pseudo-response that either suggests I upgrade my firmware, downgrade
> my firmware or in some other way ducks the question. It appears that
> the support staff is so overwhelmed that they try to dispose of old
> tickets in the most expedient way possible, by quickly writing
> anything and hoping the customer just drops the issue.
>
> Does this sound familiar to anyone else on this list?
Indeed.
I have been having problems with a 4048, and called their
"priority" support. Last time I called (yesterday), the
support person telnet'd to my max, looked at some
stuff, and hung up on me. I am now on the phone with them
again, their so-called "priority" support. Have been on
hold waiting for a support rep for over 73 minutes.
My $0.02 worth
Thanks,
Brad
>
> Of the four or five tickets I've opened in the last few months, only
> one received an immediate, lucid response stating that the problem
> was a firmware bug and was fixed in TAOS 8.0.3. Unfortunately, TAOS
> 8.0.3 hasn't been released, but that's another story. The remaining
> tickets are being given the runaround and the support provided has
> been effectively nil.
>
> I've used Ascend gear for years. Does this make me consider my options?
Yes.
> --
>
> Peter Lalor Infoasis
> plalor@infoasis.com The San Francisco Bay Area's Macintosh
> 415-459-7991 Consultant and Internet Service Provider
> 415-459-7992 fax http://www.infoasis.com/
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
From: Ray Davis <ray@carpe.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:26:01 +0200
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 2000, 7.0.4, Call Refused
> > Now if a call comes in with a call-id and the radius users file
> > knows this call-id, the call is authenticated as expected. But if
> > a call comes in with an unknown call-id, the call is immediately
> > rejected (call refused) and the caller is not given the
> > opportunity to authenticate with pap/chap. Only if the call has
> > no call-id is pap/chap allowed.
>
> > Under Ethernet/Answer these are set:
> > Use Answer as Default=Yes
> > Profile Reqd=Yes
> > Id Auth=Prefer
>
> Are you using radius? You may need to set up another radius profile.
Yes - the same radius as before the sw upgrade. Customers with fixed
routers and 2-way network routes have 2 entries (custname-out and the
call-id phone number) and don't do pap/chap in addition to call-id
auth. Customers with single dynamically assigned ip typically have
a single username/password (pap/chap) entry.
I've been adding phone number (call-id) entries for those users that
I can figure out what number they used to phone in on, but this isn't
the solution. We need to be able to have call-id auth working along
with pap/chap (with or without a known call-id). Roaming users may
be dialing in from any random number.
Cheers,
Ray
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
------------------------------
End of ascend-users-digest V96 #1970
************************************
++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++
To unsubscribe:
"echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com"
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or <ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>