RE: [TCLUG:17130] Dreamweaver (was: <OT:anti-M$> *scary* stuff...)

["Schlough, Mark" <Mark.Schlough@mortgage.wellsFargo.COM>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Nick.T.Reinking@supervalu.com [SMTP:Nick.T.Reinking@supervalu.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, May 03, 2000 9:25 AM
> To:	tclug-list@mn-linux.org
> Subject:	Re: [TCLUG:17130] Dreamweaver (was: <OT:anti-M$> *scary*
> stuff...)
> 
> No, I run Dreamweaver on Windows.  :P  WINE
> 
	I know, I was being fecious.  I have to run it here at work.  It is
cool for static, pages, but it doesn't know much about dynamic stuff which
makes it a bit frustrating.  It's also a resource hog.  With Dreamweaver and
Outlook opened here at work, my machine is SLOW!

	Actually, I was hoping you would separate what you run concurrently
on your Linux box and what you run on you Windows box to push it.

> isn't good enough for Dreamweaver, although you
> could certainly run it under VMWare.
> 
> Also, I can't say I've had your problem with Dreamweaver -
> but I'm a pretty anti-frames kinda guy, so I've never worked
> with frames in Dreamweaver. 
> 
	I am too, but my boss has shown me that frames are the way to go for
this project.


> But what you see as my applications are why I run Windows
> on my main desktop:
> 
	I can see why.  If your OS doesn't run the apps you need, then run
the proper OS.  That seems pretty reasonable.

> Photoshop (GIMP is good, but it's not Photoshop, maybe in
> a few years - GIMP is also held back by some weaknesses
> in X)
> 
> Dreamweaver (I don't know any WYSIWYG editors for Linux,
> and certainly none that are as delicious as Dreamweaver)
> 
	StarOffice seems pretty decent.  Amaya, seems good too.

> Premiere (Linux needs a good non-linear video editing suite)
> 
> MPEG Encoding (This is a tough one - some serious brains
> are needed here to do good MPEG encoding - brains I don't
> have. :P  )
> 
> DVD Playing (LiViD is getting there, but it's still a slideshow
> in stereo, not what I'm looking for)
> 
> Nick Reinking
>  << File: ATT1231864.txt >>