TCLUG Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!
From: Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
Date: 07 May 2000 09:59:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: David Wood's message of "Sun, 7 May 2000 01:46:36 -0500 (CDT)"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0005070140320.2761-100000@tiny>
Reply-To: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
Sender: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)

David Wood <jbevren@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Sun, 7 May 2000, Yaron wrote:
> Basic theory on signal 11 (also known as segmentation fault, called page
> fault in windows) states that somehow, somewhere, the cpu was told to access

I believe you mean General Protection Fault.  A page fault is just a cache
miss.

-- 
Jon Schewe 
http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
schewe@tcfreenet.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!
  - From: David Wood <jbevren@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!
  - From: David Wood <jbevren@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:17312] Cooling? (Was Sig11)
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:17303] FreeBSD
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:17305] Aaahhh!!! Signal 11!!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread