Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Pipeline 50 Dual-Channel Q.

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Pipeline 50 Dual-Channel Q.
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 18:24:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971006182102.00749944@cp-tel.net>
References: <199710061950.MAA20453@core.atmnet.net><199710060545.WAA16124@max.bungi.com><199710060545.WAA16124@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 06:21 PM 10/6/97 -0500, Nolan W. Bailey, Jr. wrote:
>
>
>My ISP has 2 Ascend MAX 4000s that are providing dial-up... if my 
>first channel on my Ascend Pipeline 50 connects to the first max... and 
>then the second channel (on the Pipeline 50) connects to the second Max..
the 
>second channel will not route any traffic... the both lines "*" will show to 
>be up... as normal... but, with one 64k channel present... any ideas how to
>fix 
>this problem...?   So that it will show 128k operational... as opposed to
>64k....?
>This doesn't happen if both channels connect to the same Ascend Max...

Sounds like your ISP isn't "stacking" correctly. When they have MAXen in a
hunt-group like that, they should enable a stacking group, and the rest
happens automatically...as others on this list have mentioned in the past.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #830

From: Mark Skinner <mark@atmnet.net>

(ASCEND) Ascend Pipeline 50 Dual-Channel Q.

From: nolan@cp-tel.net (Nolan W. Bailey, Jr.)

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P50
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 50 Q.
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Ascend Pipeline 50 Dual-Channel Q.
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Re: P50
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread