Re: (ASCEND) IE4.0 vs. Pipeline Monitor/Configurator.

To: "Clifford Donley" <cliff@donleys.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) IE4.0 vs. Pipeline Monitor/Configurator.
From: "Derek J. Stutsman" <dereks@dallas.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 21:47:05 -0500
Cc: <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
Reply-To: "Derek J. Stutsman" <dereks@dallas.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

>this caused the problem. The Configurator install offers the option of
>installing the basic Java files on the system, but this doesn't seem to be
>a reasonable choice because many of the Java files updated in the new IE
>would be overwritten with questionable results.


I had the same problem.  The novelty of having a Java configurator has worn
off.  I would have preferred a straight Win32 tool.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) IE4.0 vs. Pipeline Monitor/Configurator.

From: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P50
Next by Date: Re: Cannot Hangup/Always Busy (Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 dying?)
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) IE4.0 vs. Pipeline Monitor/Configurator.
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) IE4.0 vs. Pipeline Monitor/Configurator.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread