RE: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

At 14:55 1998/08/22 -0500, Raul Zighelboim wrote:
>Jim; why do you believe that the Max should allways repond with the IP
>assigned to the _last_ dialup  user instead of the IP of the max, even
>when traceroutes are run to someone elses network ?  

Well now that part I can't explain ;^)

>Also, were do you
>get the idea that I want unnumberred interfaces ?

Because you want it to respond with the IP of the ethernet
even when the packet would be generated from the WAN port,
If you were using numbered interfaces it would respond with the IP
of that interface and not of the ethernet.

-J
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Max 4000 Fatal Error 1001, revision 6.1.7
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....
• Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 and randomness of the Max IP address....
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread