RE: (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?

[Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>]

At 02:55 PM 10/16/97 -0000, Peter Leigh wrote:
>
>On 09-Oct-97 Peter Leigh wrote:
>[nwnet connection]
>>Ip Options:
>>   LAN Adrs=0.0.0.0/0 [-> set this to our max's IP address / subnet]
>>   WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 
>>   IF Adrs=0.0.0.0/0 [ -> set this to <ip address allocated by our max> /
32]
>[...]
>
>That fixed it in that our client can now get a ppp connection. Both
>values needed to be set as shown above.
>
>Question: does this indicate some problem with the max allocating IP
addresses
>(we have Pool-only=yes) or is this normal for P75s?

That doesn't make sense to me. You need the MAX's IP address as you
mention, to
put something in the routing table for this connection. I don't see WHY you
would need the IF Adrs though. I have it set to default 0.0.0.0 - and works
just
great. 


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• RE: (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?
• From: North West Net <sales@nwnet.co.uk>

References:

• (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?
• From: Peter Leigh <pete@nwnet.co.uk>
• RE: (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?
• From: Peter Leigh <pete@nwnet.co.uk>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipe 50 Pin's to jumper.
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Access Control RADIUS <--> Kerberos
• Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?
• Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) P75 -> Max : CL OK c=47?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread